From what I was told at the time, some lower than average stuff is permitted if it's rare or unusual or no longer obtainable or even historical (that is, made a long time ago).
Also things that no longer exist which have been captured on tape, produced on VHS and not DVD etc including old 8mm film.
I would think that a low quality (or even "live") recording is better than nothing IF nothing better exists.
With stuff like videos of existing rides, HD is the acceptable thing and source or excellent induction but what about those rides that closed when video cameras where new or where source isn't available and induction near impossible?
I doubt we would like to lose those or not have them here just because they weren't up to modern specs. I hope so, anyway.
Those that complain of the lo-quality may just not realise that it's the best currently available.
We should be glad that we have something while we wait for source to appear.
Of course, all such torrents should have a reason stated as to why the quality isn't as good as it could be added to the description or a warning that the quality is poor etc.
At worst, the torrent could be removed by the Admins if it isn't good enough.
Let's face it, some of us want perfection or nothing while some of us are just so grateful we have somthing
I'd hate to see Steamboat Willie binned just because it's in B&W and not widescreen with Dolby Surround Sound
Just my opinion of course.
